[molman]

You could write and interesting anthropological paper on this thread.

The clash of cultures of public and private is interesting. For better or worst however, those leading a publicly traded company (as successful as Apple) much like those with celebrity (which Steve Jobs has) tend to lose those elements of privacy that you personally may value.

It has been interesting to see the reporting around this, particularly when I get a sense that much has been written based upon very little true insight. I personally don't know what Steve is like as an individual, I've heard enough stories on both sides of virtue to believe he is like many people with his good and bad. Nor do I have a clear idea on the line between him and the achievements of Apple as a company, though you can't help but attribute some of it to him.

I think as some have already said, Apple will continue to be successful for the foreseeable future. Steve is still part of the company (as Chairman & Employee) and while there may be some reflection on his capacity in light of his reported illness there is enough of a trajectory, and the bedrock of many existing individuals like Tim Cook who will (to my mind) see the company continue to move forward. Indeed I suspect that it may even be an opportunity for some of those whose input was not so publicly celebrated to be illuminated, if not acknowledged.

Anyway whilst I think this is a notable development in light of the Steve that is painted (iconic, irreplaceable, genius etc..), I think Apple as a company will be fine.

As to Steve himself I do personally wish him good health (in the same way I would also wish anyone, even my local garbage man good health).