View Single Post
Old 08-27-2011, 04:31 PM   #290
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
True, but Apple didn't try to get it banned for being slim. The parts that they commented about were there even in the 7" samsung tab that predates the ipad 2.
Better not tell Samsung's lawyers that...

One of the key points of this injunction is that there is 'urgency'. Samsung can overturn the injunction if they can show that Apple didn't react within a specified time (i.e. failed to show urgency). The judge has put it upon Samsung to prove that Apple knew that the Tab would be sold in Germany before a date in June. Apple say that they didn't have the final specifications for the Tab by then.

If the 7" model from last year shared all the features that Apple were specifically trying to get banned then no sense of urgency would have been shown and the injunction would get thrown out.

My understanding is that it is the 10" Tab that Apple specifically feel is copying the iPad.

Graham

Last edited by Graham; 08-27-2011 at 04:34 PM.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote