Quote:
Originally Posted by elcreative
Why would you say that... I made a simple factual comment about the start of a business with no subtext at all and you read something else into it... why can't people read what is written and take it at face value...  |
I would say I said what I said because you wrote in your post "Pretty good about MS being innovative.." which is far from being loaded. As such I would contend I was replying exactly on face value, to your proposition followed by a fact. I would also further put forward that your fact selection itself also contains meaning in the context of a response to my prior post.
Finally I would argue that what you said the first time was more factual ("first product that really got them going"), rather than your second rephrasing "about the start of a business" which is actually erroneous as there was a Microsoft before DOS (MS-DOS).
Hopefully that clears up your chin scratching confusion.
