|
I don't like that quote at all.
"Copy" clearly implies that Samsung didn't do their own work. It is entirely possible to develop from scratch something that still ends up infringing on a patent. I do not like how Apply continues to insist that Samsung is guilty of intellectual theft.
"Closest copy" clearly implies that there are other tablets on the market that are also 'stolen' from Apple.
Can't they argue patent infringement without the arms-flailing outrage?
|