What I am reading s that when we get to the point of books that looks like they have no chance of winning, they don't get voted on even if they may have been the ones wanted. So what happens if the two or three books that have a chance of winning get voted on. And the ones that have no chance of winning won't win because of this. If everyone actually voted for what was wanted and NOT because it might be a wasted vote, then we may very well have a different result.
What is the problem with giving a blind vote a try? Does it mean that because you won't be seeing who voted for what, you cannot make up your own minds? I'm getting that sort of vibe from some.
Be honest here... who did not vote for the book he/she wanted because it seems to have no chance of winning and instead voted for one of the the two front runners instead?
|