View Single Post
Old 08-23-2011, 10:03 AM   #6
ectoplasm
Addict
ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 255
Karma: 1151364
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: Aura HD and H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
That makes sense, I guess.

But then again, since your spreadsheet has a lot of fantasy in it already (because of the Hugo and Nebula nominees), why leave out the tiny portion that the Locus award breaks out (and in fact may already be in the database because of the other awards)?
You're making too much sense here When compiling the list, I thought there would be more separation. But as you pointed out, it's not that black and white.

I think I'll add the Locus fantasy back in. The Arthur C. Clarke nominees also need to be added. I'm going to remove the "excluded fantasy" blurb. Unfortunately, I can't change the thread title, so it must remain "Science Fiction Awards Spreadsheet".
ectoplasm is offline   Reply With Quote