View Single Post
Old 08-20-2011, 10:20 AM   #214
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgmueller View Post
But one has to admit: Before the introduction of iPhone, we've never seen anything like it.
As I showed in my earlier posts, in terms of trade dress - which is the basis for this injunction - we have seen things very, very like it.

Samsung in particular were using the flat rectangle with rounded corners, black bezel, side ports and metallic rim in their electronic devices well over a year before the release of the iPod Touch or iPhone. Samsung's current devices share the look that those earlier devices of theirs had.

The JooJoo matches the Apple document precisely, yet was revealed and released before the iPad.

I agree with you that it will take the courts to unpick the technological patents, and that Apple may well have a good case there, but this injunction is about the look of the devices and the packaging.

Graham

Last edited by Graham; 08-20-2011 at 10:23 AM.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote