View Single Post
Old 08-19-2011, 09:42 AM   #210
elcreative
Wizard
elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,888
Karma: 5875940
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: PRS505, 600, 350, 650, Nexus 7, Note III, iPad 4 etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
My point is that nobody should need to go after anybody. These are obvious design choices which should not be patentable. I don't believe Apple has a proven patent for them either; isn't this the start of a proceeding where they are claiming such a patent?

Graham
Most obvious things are only obvious after the fact when someone has implemented them... that's one reason for patents and copyright... stops the "well that's obvious so you can't patent it etc..." arguments. At some point anything has to be put into practice and the implementer gets and advantage for that... trouble is that now patent law has gone terminally stupid...
elcreative is offline   Reply With Quote