View Single Post
Old 08-18-2011, 03:24 PM   #202
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockdaMan View Post
I would posit that the date it was presented to the public is immaterial. Of greater significance would be the date that the patents, processes and trademarks were presented for registration to the government.

It would be interesting to see Joo Joo go after the Android tablet makers.
My point is that nobody should need to go after anybody. These are obvious design choices which should not be patentable. I don't believe Apple has a proven patent for them either; isn't this the start of a proceeding where they are claiming such a patent?

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote