Quote:
Originally Posted by RockdaMan
Agreed.
|
Really? You agree that judges are never wrong? Interesting. So I would assume that you think a tiered system of judges and an appeals process are utterly unnecessary?
I'm curious. Are the judges never wrong in their legal rulings, or are they never wrong full-stop in your worldview? It must be very annoying to be married to one, if it's the latter. I can't even imagine what it would be like to have one for a parent.
I curious what you think about laws that are eventually overturned. Something like a law against inter-racial marriage leaps immediately to mind: if you think laws are never wrong, then how do you reconcile something like that? Was it never "really" a law since it was wrong in the first place (a little No True Scotsman of you, but at least consistent) or was it wrongly overturned since it wasn't wrong being that it was a law and all? Or was it right when it was a law but wrong once it wasn't? There's so many layers.
Maybe something less controversial would be in order along the lines of the copyright extension law? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on that one.
Or perhaps you weren't serious with your post. Yes, that seems most likely.