View Single Post
Old 08-16-2011, 08:19 AM   #29
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
My thinking is that they made the deal for the patents ONLY.
I agree. (Although they might also see some value in being able to release what would essentially be reference design devices)

Quote:
Selling the hardware business to some Chinese company (who desperately wants the development know-how and marketing connections --- to Verizon, etc --- and gets government money for the deal) would recoup a significant part of what they paid for the whole company in the first place.
But what is a significant part?
Before the offer, the market valued the business at about $7.5Bn.
The company had $3Bn in case, which leaves about $4.5Bn for the value of the patents and hardware business.
Strip off the patents, and how much is the hardware business going to sell for?
Now compare that to the $12.5Bn Google is paying.

Quote:
In the end, anything they can get for the hardware part would be a good deal for them.
In the real world yes, in the world of accountancy maybe not. Google would have to book a multi-billion dollar loss on the sale.
I'm not saying it doesn't make sense, but it could look really ugly on the books.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote