View Single Post
Old 08-15-2011, 01:54 PM   #12
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockdaMan View Post
No one has ever successfully licensed a platform *and* competed with licensees at the same time. Apple tried it (twice) as did Palm & Nokia
@gartenberg
I suppose it depends on your definition of "platform"... but JVC licensed VHS technology *and* competed with licensees. I think that this is pretty comparable to what Google is trying to do, particularly as Android is (more or less) an open standard. As was VHS; Palm and Apple were not.

Note, too, that when Palm and Apple were both hardware companies whose products were successful because of their OSes. People wanted a Palm Pilot because of the OS in the same way that people wanted a mac for *its* OS (the mac clones were in Apple's pre-industrial design days). When other companies could get the same software on other hardware, Apple and Palm could no longer charge a premium for their hardware. This danger doesn't really apply to Google, nor did it apply to JVC.

Having said that, hardware is different from software, and Google is undertaking a risky project.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote