View Single Post
Old 08-14-2011, 07:25 PM   #70
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
I don't really know enough about German law in this area to have much of an informed opinion, but after reading the petition for a preliminary injunction (which you can find here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/61993811/1...alaxy-Tab-10-1), I am a little more convinced that Apple might have a case.
Thanks for the link. I thought that the galaxy tab was compared to ipad in general, not specifically ipad 2, since this wasn't mentioned in the links in the OP, but isn't it strange that they actually managed to compare these 2 and make a case of it since they were released 1 month apart?

Were they making the case that Samsung got their hands on the ipad 2 patent design papers and made a product very similar to that one?
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote