Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
Because this was the only thread about this topic over the last several months, and Wolfie was the only one that took that particular premature stance, right? Repeatedly, annoyingly and now obviously unwarranted-ly.  |
I don't know that JS's concerns were unwarranted
before he learned they had been addressed, any more than I think they were less valid for being repeated on various threads. If people didn't wish to engage him, they didn't have to.
As to JS's actual point: I've disagreed with him and agreed with you for most of this thread.
That doesn't mean, however, that I think someone who disagrees with us strenuously should be dismissed by you or even insulted by others.
Quote:
|
My, how my recent posts in the general section, seem to have attracted your admittedly impressive logical dissection skills. I'm flattered.
|
You needn't feel singled out and you certainly aren't being belittled or stalked.
It really is a coincidence that the last two posts to which I responded were yours. They appeared after posts of mine (roughly) on threads to which I'd subscribed.
I might be responding to you publicly on this thread, but I'm not attacking you personally or targeting you in general -- if I've given you that impression, then I apologize. We might disagree from time to time, but I bear you no ill will.