Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I agree most are not arguing that point. But the few who are, are ridiculously vocal about it.  |
How are they supposed to make a
non-vocal point (
non-vocal in the sense of not overtly stated or expressed)?
You have a person who was afraid of Kindle owners receiving an unfair advantage, but who then gained more knowledge of how the process worked. Ultimately, he conceded.
You have a few others complaining about the wait times that might ensue once a larger group of readers descends on the library.
The first point is moot and the second is one with which I don't agree. But I see nothing wrong with people raising objections even when the objections seem oddly undemocratic.
Given equal time, a decent argument should only be refined by opposing arguments.