View Single Post
Old 08-11-2011, 10:24 PM   #5
bobcdy
Fanatic
bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
bobcdy's Avatar
 
Posts: 527
Karma: 1048576
Join Date: May 2009
Device: bebook; prs-950; nook simple touch; HTC Jetstream tablet
As I mentioned in my original post, it was distinctly odd that only a single location where <i> triggered Sigil's reaction; the text at that location certainly seemed no different than in several hundred other locations that Sigil ignored. With Tidy clicked off, however, there is still some tidy-like responses that create xhtml corrections. I never have tried to note these responses, or to experiment to see if deleting the entire section around the offending <i> would take care of the problem.

For the most part, though, I really appreciate Sigil's little notice of an error that usually can be manually corrected easily.
bobcdy is offline   Reply With Quote