View Single Post
Old 08-11-2011, 10:34 AM   #29
Dulin's Books
Wizard
Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,806
Karma: 13500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
Its not a Patent Its an EU Community Design which is akin to a Trademark. This is the one in question

http://www.scribd.com/doc/61944044/C...000181607-0001

Its Ridiculous. Also The Judge did not rule on the merits, simply granted the injunction as is common practice in this court in these types of cases.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockdaMan View Post
Apple?
...not the two judges that ruled the same in two different and far away lands?
There was no ruling in Australia. It was reported wrong. There are two versions of the Tab 10" device. The 10.1 and the earlier 10.1v . Apple filed for the injunction ( or filed an intent to file for the injunction) against one and Samsung said they weren't launching that one any way they were using the other. So Samsung "stopping the launch" got reported as Apple stopped Samsung from launching.

Last edited by Dulin's Books; 08-11-2011 at 12:22 PM.
Dulin's Books is offline   Reply With Quote