View Single Post
Old 08-10-2011, 11:51 AM   #24
TimW
Wizard
TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TimW's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 6824104
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Southeastern Kentucky
Device: KK3G, KPW1, Sony PRST1, Sony PRS350, iPod Touch 5G
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Yes, I understand that. You seemed to be saying earlier, though, that it was a. complex problem for an on-line retailer to determine the correct rate of sales tax to charge you. I was using B&N as an example of a retailer who clearly have solved that problem, given that they must charge on-line customers the correct rate of tax, based on where they live.
It can be done...not cheaply I'm sure. Perhaps Amazon feels that Congress will finally be pressured to pass legislation to simplify the process, therefore making it cheaper to implement. Amazon charges sales tax in my state because they have distribution facilities here. My state charges a flat 6% sales tax. If California had a simplified taxation rate, perhaps Amazon would not have taken the steps they did. Who knows?
TimW is offline   Reply With Quote