View Single Post
Old 08-10-2011, 07:48 AM   #16
5thWiggle
Benevolent Evil Lord
5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.5thWiggle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
5thWiggle's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,704
Karma: 48339466
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Evil Canada (We all have goatees!)
Device: Galaxy Note 8.0, Galaxy Note, iPad Mini, PocketEdge(retired)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceflor View Post
It's in german, sorry for that, but to clarify what it says is that the court did agree to halt the distribution momentarily to study the case and that it is not a patent breach case but a design copying case.
Sorry aceflor, but esthetic designs are patentable and, in a number of cases, rigorously defended. Most notable cases I know of are in the field of electric guitars. Fender, Gibson et al routinely go after clones of their more successful models. Most rulings are in their favour even though the name on the headstock is different. The criteria for design patents seems to be that a consumer can tell "at a reasonable glance" that the object was indeed produced by the patent holder, and not a competitor.

Link to one of Apple's design patents
5thWiggle is offline   Reply With Quote