View Single Post
Old 08-09-2011, 02:55 PM   #68
DMB
Old Git
DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMB's Avatar
 
Posts: 958
Karma: 1840790
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Switzerland (mostly)
Device: Two kindle PWs wifi, kindle fire, iPad3 wifi
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post

I think a lot of people are turned off of reading through education. I have a degree in literature, but I HATED "literature" in middle and high school because my teachers taught it so poorly. (I *was* an avid "reader", but what I was reading was what we'd now call genre lit instead of general lit.) It wasn't until I got to college and was lucky enough to have a stellar English teacher that I realized that fancy literature could be fun and thought-provoking.
I don't think I came across the concept of "literature" until I found myself at secondary school (normally 11--18 in England) and "English Literature" was one of the subjects we were taught. I found it pretty boring, and looking back I think it was the lowest-common-denominator mode of teaching. I "did" a couple of Shakespeare plays, some assorted poetry and Pride and Prejudice for O-level Eng Lit. There may have been other stuff, but I don't remember at this distance in time. I don't think it was ever explained that these weren't contemporary works. At the same time I was reading any books I could get my hands on, with no particular pattern.

When I was 14 I went into the sixth form (normally 16--18) and started to do A-levels. A-levels represent specialisation and one does only a few subjects. My subjects were Pure Maths, French and Art. But then I changed schools and for inexplicable reasons my subjects were changed. My A-levels were at first Pure Maths, Applied Maths and Physics. The Head then decided that I was in danger of turning into "an illiterate scientist", and A-level English was added to my quiver. By that stage I was having more English lessons than anyone else in the school. I also had classes in Use of English (one had to take an exam in this to get something called a State Scholarship), something else called English for Scientists and A-level English.

A-level English for me was like Alice's passing through the door into Wonderland. Suddenly I was presented with a whole world I hadn't known existed. The syllabus was split between one competent teacher and one brilliant teacher. I immediately fell in love with Chaucer -- I still can't say why -- and I read through and round the syllabus. It started me on a path of autodidactism that I am still following today. I had read avidly from before I started school at the age of 5, but it was systemless and inchoate reading. From starting A-level English I had goals and aspirations.
DMB is offline   Reply With Quote