View Single Post
Old 08-07-2011, 05:25 PM   #27
kjk
.
kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,408
Karma: 5647231
Join Date: Oct 2008
Device: never enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by afa View Post
you're right - a mere 60% share, particularly if it's declining due to increased competition, is not enough for it to be considered anywhere close to a monopoly.
But just some percentage of market share isn't the only criteria for anti-trust investigation.

Apple has had 75-80% of the MP3 player market for years. But no one found enough evidence they got that share through non-competitive behavior. I doubt anyone would argue that they don't have a monopoly on that market though.
kjk is offline   Reply With Quote