View Single Post
Old 08-03-2011, 07:36 AM   #12
wayrad
Fanatic
wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wayrad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 551
Karma: 1121392
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Device: HTC One M8
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin View Post
That is a whole different issue, currently working its way through the courts between Amazon and New York state. This wasn't over whether a company has to collect sales tax at all, but rather over whether or not a specific category of product is taxable even if you buy it in a local store.
What I had in mind was that the initial post indicates it's a question of whether a California company should have to charge NY sales tax on an item. Regardless of the type of merchandise and whether it's inherently taxable or not, I can't see the question even arising unless the company has a brick and mortar presence of some sort in NY, as Apple does. I probably didn't express it well.

Last edited by wayrad; 08-03-2011 at 07:45 AM.
wayrad is offline   Reply With Quote