Quote:
Originally Posted by EatingPie
We can be reasonably sure they presented what happened to the author of the article. We can be reasonably sure the article author had the opportunity to independently verify claims made by interviewing others and cross-referencing said claims.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EatingPie
The evidence I was referring to was the evidence presented in the article, basically the only evidence about this situation that we have. (Though there is now a comment, and an editorial quoted in the thread.)
|
This is where we disagree. I don't see evidence in the article. It just said that Scroggins made a complaint last year because of religious reasons and the superintendent announced that 2 of the 3 books were banned because of the conclusion of the board where 3 out of 7 people were absent (for the whole year?). On the other hand, a person who gives the impression that they are employed by the high-school, talks about peoples jobs being threatened.
It's easy to google information. And if you do that, it actually seems like there is reason to believe the claims of the commenter (the article that I linked to before).
If you don't want to google things, let me help you:
The earliest complaint of Wesley Scroggins. that I could find on the subject. - May 2010
A 29 page manifesto - June 2010
A not-interview of Wesley Scroggins where if you pay attention you will hear the words "You mean the history of you not being able to get on the school board?" at 1:02.