View Single Post
Old 08-02-2011, 11:25 PM   #222
EatingPie
Blueberry!
EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.
 
EatingPie's Avatar
 
Posts: 888
Karma: 133343
Join Date: Mar 2007
Device: Sony PRS-500 (RIP); PRS-600 (Good Riddance); PRS-505; PRS-650; PRS-350
Wanted to bust this out since I had a tl;dr above.

Here is the article statement about criteria for the books: "The panel reviewed existing board policy and the public rating systems that already exist for music, TV and video games."

Given that there were 20 uses of the f-word in the book, it would have obtained an R-rating in today's film market. That means nobody under 18 without a parent or guardian. That is exactly what the administrator states are the reasons for the book's removal (language, age-appropriateness), and the the criteria for being able to read it anyway: a parent can allow the student to read the book.

-Pie

Last edited by EatingPie; 08-02-2011 at 11:29 PM.
EatingPie is offline