View Single Post
Old 08-01-2011, 08:34 PM   #178
EatingPie
Blueberry!
EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.
 
EatingPie's Avatar
 
Posts: 888
Karma: 133343
Join Date: Mar 2007
Device: Sony PRS-500 (RIP); PRS-600 (Good Riddance); PRS-505; PRS-650; PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCION View Post
How do you know religion played no role? You're going based on a statement released to the public? Come on. The fact that the person who filed the complaint said it was "anti-bible" is what got their attention.

Edit: The letter of complaint probably ended with "What would YouKnowWho do?".
Let me clarify my response.

The majority of posts I read here assumed that fundamentalist religious beliefs were the issue, period. However, this is against the statements made in the article; it specifically states such beliefs were not at issue in the decision. So you really should not be asking me how I know, but rather all the people posting attacks against fundamentalism. There is no evidence presented that fundamentalist beliefs were at fault; indeed, evidence is that it's entirely the contrary.

-Pie
EatingPie is offline