View Single Post
Old 08-01-2011, 02:00 PM   #63
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolenka View Post
Apple takes 30% of app sales. Free apps are not subject to this (30% of 0 is 0). However, how about that app that is free but uses micro transactions or ads to profit? Should Apple be denied a cut for hosting the app just because the developer wants to profit differently? So take a cut from the in-app purchases, and provide iAds to encourage devs by giving them a bigger cut of the ad revenue.
It's 30% of what is sold through the app. And the problem is that with books the retailer (now called agent) gets 30%. If they give 30% to Apple they don't make any money, while they still have costs.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote