My Bad
Sorry -- I think I just figured out what you guys are talking about: namely the Kindle doc in question is from Wikipedia "List of Unicode" editing out the table formatting which Kindle doesn't support. And that wikipedia document is incomplete -- it doesn't give the names of all the unicode glyphs nor representations thereof. So I guess you meant "corropt" in the sense of being an incomplete listing of all the Unicode Glyphs, which is a true statement.
|