View Single Post
Old 07-30-2011, 09:05 AM   #42
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by crich70 View Post
That agrees with the point I was going to make. Site x is found to be guilty of offering material that infringes on copyright and access to it is blocked, but what is stopping them from just opening up shop again somewhere else on the web? It's not like someone can police the whole internet after all. Seems more like a feel good ruling rather than something that will make any real effect on things.
I think the ruling provides that the rights owners can continually supply BT with new blocking rules, to make it harder to evade the restrictions.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote