View Single Post
Old 07-29-2011, 08:28 AM   #27
Arrghus
Zealot
Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!Arrghus , Klaatu Barada Niktu!
 
Arrghus's Avatar
 
Posts: 143
Karma: 5002
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Llandudno, Wales
Device: Kindle PW2; Nexus 5X
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
As has already been stated, it's not "technologically infeasible"; the mechanism for doing so already exists and is already used to block certain sites.

Who is it unfair towards? The owners of the criminal web sites involved?
But that mechanism is routinely bypassed, ergo, it is not working.

It's unfair that the onus is on the ISP to police the internet. If people choose to abuse the use of a service and utilise it for criminal purposes, is it really the fault of the ISP?

P.S. If a terrorist uses a mobile phone to communicate with other terrorists and plot an attack, is if the fault of the network carrier for not stopping them?
Arrghus is offline   Reply With Quote