Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
As has already been stated, it's not "technologically infeasible"; the mechanism for doing so already exists and is already used to block certain sites.
Who is it unfair towards? The owners of the criminal web sites involved?
|
But that mechanism is routinely bypassed, ergo, it is not working.
It's unfair that the onus is on the ISP to police the internet. If people choose to abuse the use of a service and utilise it for criminal purposes, is it really the fault of the ISP?
P.S. If a terrorist uses a mobile phone to communicate with other terrorists and plot an attack, is if the fault of the network carrier for not stopping them?