View Single Post
Old 07-28-2011, 07:04 AM   #5
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS View Post
The argument against this approach seems to be that, in order to be consistent, you would have to close down Google because sometimes it returns links to material that infringe someones copyright.
The ruling over copyright infringement has generally been that devices, sites, etc, which have significant non-infringing uses are permissible. Most people, I think, would agree that Google is primarily a non-infringing site, whereas the primary purpose of the site against which this ruling has been made is to give people access to copyright-infringing material.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote