Quote:
Originally Posted by chas0039
You can have your opinion, but you are wrong. I have looked at both and my judgement is backed up by reviewers here and here and here and here and here. |
Holy irrelevance, Überbat. How do a series of comparisons between the Kindle, various Nooks and the iRiver pertain to a discussion about PRS-generation Sony Readers with Pearl touchscreens, especially since half of the non-Sony eReaders compared don't even use a Pearl screen in the first place?
Most of the blogs seem to be comparing the K3 to the iRiver Story HD, which no one here has even mentioned. The one comparison that talks about the Nook ST is more relevant, but I still didn't see comparisons to the PRS series.
Additionally, in every case in your post, you've linked to
the entire blog and not the individual entry, which effectively makes anyone who wants to know what you're talking about have to do your homework: (1) Figuring out which of twenty entries on the page is the one you mean, (2) attempting to determine why you mentioned the one relevant entry and (3) what words or phrases might get the reader closer to said relevant post, which the reader would know if you gave some sort of synopsis in your links.
I don't usually demand that strangers posting on the internet observe my personal hyperlink grooming habits, but for the love of Yahweh Crochet, if you want us to accept your point, shouldn't you be a wee Hank less indolent about presenting corroborating evidence?
BTW: One of your blog entries contains this phase, which alludes to differences in presentation, subjective or not, being caused by something other than the screen itself. I know that doesn't address the point you're making, but it does address EatingPie as quoted by DP:
Quote:
|
[M]y eyes, which are used to the Pearl Screen as implemented for the Kindle 3 . . .
|