View Single Post
Old 07-26-2011, 01:29 PM   #18
whitearrow
Guru
whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.whitearrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 808
Karma: 2260766
Join Date: Apr 2008
Device: Kindle Oasis 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by frquixote View Post
Sorry, but the First Amendment says:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "

I don't see anything that says Congress was involved in this decision.
The First Amendment applies to state and local governments via the doctrine of incorporation, usually via the 14th Amendment. It has been so since the 1940's. Relevant First Amendment cases include Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) 310 U.S. 296, Everson v. Board of Education (1947) 330 U.S. 1 and many subsequent cases citing those.

The right to free exercise and no state establishment (and many other constitutional rights included in the 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th amendments) would mean little to most of us if states and local governments could make laws infringing upon those rights.

Last edited by whitearrow; 07-26-2011 at 01:34 PM.
whitearrow is offline