Hasn't it been argued ad nauseam that it is not possible to develop a DRM scheme that can't be broken? Something about the code for the key having to be in the code for the lock so the rightful buyer can access the content?
So really, what's the issue? Those who want to free up their content will be able to if they are just patient enough to wait for someone to crack the DRM. No different to how it is today really.
Of course if the issue is one of principle, ie: that DRM is evil and should never have been invented in the first place, that is another matter and I'd have to say I agree. In principle that is.
Cheers,
PKFFW