View Single Post
Old 07-15-2011, 09:22 PM   #11
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Having said all that, I went and looked a bit closer. And you're right, there definitely are fonts that have problems with a leading of 1.2, especially when dealing with capitals with diacritics, which I hadn't considered previously.

A well-behaved font like Minion handles these just fine, without allowing the diacritical marks to collide with descenders (all pics with a leading of 1.2em):


But fonts that are designed to work at really small sizes can make compromises with their heights that cause bad results:

which looks a bit nasty. It seems self-defeating to design a font to allow people to cram as much text into as small a space as possible and then include things like this which will force the typographer to increase the leading, but there you go.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Minion.PNG
Views:	437
Size:	10.3 KB
ID:	74417   Click image for larger version

Name:	Lexicon.PNG
Views:	457
Size:	11.2 KB
ID:	74418  
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote