View Single Post
Old 07-10-2011, 10:15 PM   #74
delphin
Evangelist
delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 434
Karma: 346901
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: SONY PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Japes View Post
Slightly bolder. I already like NimbusMod alot, but find myself using the Caecilia Bold version more often because it's ever so slightly bolder/thicker, without being a TRUE bold (it's more a semi-bold). I would like it if NimbusMod were slightly thicker.
No problem.

I'll probably rename my new Nimbus font to something like 'Nimbus Book' to avoid confusion with the previously posted NimbusMod version, and I can easily also create a 'Nimbus Black' version.

The 'Book' version would be about like NimbusMod is now (just a bit heavier than the original non-edited Nimbus font) and the 'Black' version would be about half way between the current NimbusMod weight and a full bold.

These are the same naming conventions used in fonts like Gentium Book, and Ariel Black.

What do you think?

Last edited by delphin; 07-10-2011 at 10:37 PM.
delphin is offline   Reply With Quote