|
I could see a case for "US publishers that have ties with with his normal UK publisher wouldn't accept it without major edits, and most small publishers wouldn't accept the limited geo restrictions, and it wasn't worth bothering with the other ones."
And I could see a situation for either "we can't sell outright skeptic stuff to our normal audience" or "the book says it disproves things and all it does is show how many of these effects can be created by chicanery; that doesn't disprove anything." (Showing how to use Photoshop to create "lights in the sky" on a picture doesn't mean there are no aurora borealis.)
|