View Single Post
Old 07-07-2011, 11:32 AM   #123
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phogg View Post
California should have simply worked to enforce tax collection by the affiliates within its jurisdiction, but then hey the state didn't get broke overnight and it didn't get broke to the vast extent that it is because it was run by people with even rudimentary competence.
How would the affiliates collect tax, don't they mainly just host banners linking to Amazon, and get paid for the referrals? They wouldn't know which items have been sold, or to where, so couldn't collect the taxes.
Besides, as I understand it, the tax is determined by the location of the buyer, which again they wouldn't know.
Even for those selling through the Amazon marketplace, it is Amazon that calculates and displays the price of the item, which would need to vary according to the location of the buyer.

Last edited by murraypaul; 07-07-2011 at 11:53 AM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote