Thread: Kansas State Librarian Argues Consortium Owns Content from OverDrive
View Single Post
Old 07-06-2011, 01:16 PM   #24
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,771
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsJoseph View Post
Ok, fine. I guess you'd also be in favor of the library just passing the cost to the library patron then. Because no matter how you break it down or how "cheap" you think it is - it is a LIBRARY borrowing program. I don't know any library systems that can afford those kind of fees to administrate collections. Especially since those fees do not include any content.

OD is full of it.
The general consensus on this forum is against individual user fees for borrowing content. With tax support dwindling, where will full funding come from?
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote