View Single Post
Old 03-25-2008, 05:42 PM   #15
Peter Sorotokin
speaking for myself
Peter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it isPeter Sorotokin knows what time it is
 
Posts: 139
Karma: 2166
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
DRM's tying people to specific devices is actually a side-effect of the actual intent, which is to prevent illegal sharing... which DRM doesn't do well. Encryption may make it easier for the user to specify as many devices as he owns to read a file, but it still doesn't prevent illegal sharing well (because, as you pointed out, the encryption can still be removed).
DRM intent is to get content owners to make as much of their content available in electronic form as possible without inconveniencing users too much. If you are a DRM vendor, ultimately you have to convince copyright holder to distribute his content.

DRM is an evolving area, but many people would say that a hight quality DRM system would stay out of the way as much as possible as long as what is being done with the content corresponds to the content's license.
Peter Sorotokin is offline   Reply With Quote