View Single Post
Old 07-01-2011, 03:02 PM   #59
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin View Post
That's because such laws were ruled unconstitutional decades ago, when mail order (and that's what buying physical products off the internet is) was big business. There's nothing new, legally, to explore there.
Read the Quill opinion again. It is unconstitutional for *a state* to require a business located in *another state* to collect taxes owed in the first state. It is perfectly constitutional for *congress*, using its power to regulate interstate commerce, to do so. For about the last decade there has been a bill similar to the "Sales Tax Fairness and Simplification Act" floating around congress that would do just that - but Congress hasn't seemed too eager to pass it, for obvious reasons.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote