View Single Post
Old 06-29-2011, 01:37 PM   #41
anamardoll
Chasing Butterflies
anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anamardoll's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
Means testing doesn't have to be complicated. Exempt patrons over a certain age; and for the rest, have them produce a food stamp card.

Again, this begs key questions:
  • who pays for their transportation to a library?
  • who pays for their ereader?
Your first criteria is arbitrary; your second inadequate.

Just because someone is old doesn't mean they don't have the means to support the library as a "Library Patron". Just because someone is too poor to pay to rent books doesn't mean they automatically have a food stamp card.

I agree with a previous poster that exemptions are onerous and not cost-effective. An opt-in pay program would be much more manageable in my opinion.

Let us also please not forget that (a) a patron does not have to travel to the library to check out an eBook, and (b) a patron does not have to have an eReader to read an eBook.
anamardoll is offline   Reply With Quote