View Single Post
Old 06-28-2011, 02:44 PM   #193
EatingPie
Blueberry!
EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.
 
EatingPie's Avatar
 
Posts: 888
Karma: 133343
Join Date: Mar 2007
Device: Sony PRS-500 (RIP); PRS-600 (Good Riddance); PRS-505; PRS-650; PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post
The idea that if lock-in ended tomorrow and B&N books could be read on Amazon devices and vice versa somehow affecting the indie situation at all is very strange to me, to say the least.
Well, as we've both demonstrated, we disagree on the affect lock-in has in terms of the price fixing.

As I stated above, "Because of lock-in, none of these stores [Amazon/B&N] has a reason to go against price fixing.... Since they have no competition, they don't have to fight against the price fixing."

If lock in ended, B&N and Amazon would compete for book sales again. The one sticking point for ebook sales competition is price fixing. Suddenly, there's motivation to get rid of that sticking point: more potential sales in an sub-market they couldn't sell to before!

That is why I think ending lock-in would lead to the end of price fixing... which would ultimately benefit small stores as well.

-Pie
EatingPie is offline   Reply With Quote