View Single Post
Old 06-28-2011, 06:32 AM   #12
ghostyjack
Guru
ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ghostyjack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ghostyjack's Avatar
 
Posts: 718
Karma: 1085610
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Device: PRS-T1, 1825PT, Galaxy Tab, One X, TF700T, Aura HD, Nexus 7
I don't realy see why they are trying to get rid of <i>. I currently use both.

If I explicitly what something in italics, I use <i>. If I'm going to place some emphasis on some text I use <em>.

For me this seems like a sensible choice as it allows me to then set in the CSS the behaviour of the tags, and with them using two different tags I have better control of my formatting.

I'd rather not have to start using span tags as this just appears to make the code look messy.
ghostyjack is offline   Reply With Quote