View Single Post
Old 06-28-2011, 03:27 AM   #11
roger64
Wizard
roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,625
Karma: 3120635
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: Kindle PW3 (wifi)
Sigil and bold-italic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faster View Post

BTW, I downloaded your sample and opened it in Sigil. The tagged <b><i>lacinia</i></b> appears correctly in code view and in Book view the word 'lacinia' is in bold-italic.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions. This is exactly my problem!!
When I look at the above EPUB with Sigil 0.4 beta Linux, this is how these joint tags got reported (see sreenshot below):

Even if the word lacinia is written correctly in bold-italic in text view , in code view it appears this way: <b class="sgc-2">lacinia</b>

So, it seems clear that Sigil 0.4. beta Linux can't stand, for some reason, joint tags like <b><i>lacinia</i></b>

This is the reason why I reported a W2X bug while in reality, it's a Sigil, say, "peculiarity".
Please, click twice to enlarge it.


@Adjust
Thanks, but for these kind of things I look for free software. I should have said it so. Sorry
roger64 is offline   Reply With Quote