Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovejedd
That only works if you know exactly which image contains the watermark. It's possible to add extraneous data to images and still have it displayed properly. Besides, I don't think they'll be stupid enough to name the watermark so obviously. You're going to have to strip out all images and check all html and xml files to make sure there are no hashes that include the digital watermark. If they do use CC# as watermark, it will no doubt be encrypted or stored as a hash. How difficult it would be to break the encryption, we don't know.
Although, no doubt, someone will figure out how to remove the watermark within a week of release.
|
Precisely. *We* don't need to know what they named the file if it's an image -- I was being facetious with my name (although how many images are embedded in a typical epub, really? The HP books aren't illustrated.) There's a big ol' internet out there and Google is a good friend.
I actually find a watermark more "invasive" than DRM. I find this whole thing....disappointing. To say the least.
