Thread: Odd problem with Sigil 0.4
View Single Post
Old 06-22-2011, 09:45 AM   #2
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,094
Karma: 60358908
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcdy View Post
Today I experienced an odd problem with Sigil 0.4. All was going well until I changed a few things in my hot-link TOC. After saving it, I tried to validate using Sigil validator and ThreePress but both kept giving me errors:

For example with my 'heading_10" in content012.xhtml the validators insisted that heading_10 was not in content012.xhtml but rather was in content014.xhtml. Same with three other entries in the Toc - always the error was noted in that location was insisted as being 2 files ahead of the actual file where the heading was used.

Finally checking carefully and being satisfied that my entries were indeed correct, I opened the file with Sigil 0.3.4, and all the errors went away after saving the file with S0.3.4

Unfortunately I don't have the offending epub because of the save with Sigil 0.3.4 so I can't send it to Valloric, but I wondered if others have encountered this type of problem? Other than this odd error, I've been very pleased with using v0.4.
First off. id="heading_10" can be used can be used ONCE in each and every document.
It is possible that Sigil 4 is now doing a "TOC Link check" (was automatic reset in 3).
I gave up on .4 after random, non-repetitive bad events.
theducks is offline   Reply With Quote