View Single Post
Old 03-20-2008, 06:08 PM   #16
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
Actually, one symbol is zero and the other symbol is one. Power (on and off) is a binary state, so someone decided to use a binary symbol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
Well, it is not really a line and a circle. This is the digital age and it is a 1 and a 0. 1 is on while 0 is off.
Perhaps so. But I've never seen a font where the 0 is perfectly round. I also suspect the intent was to make it symbols, rather than glyphs, to be international (though numerals are pretty international these days, so perhaps not), but in any case, I rather doubt it's meant to be 1 and 0.

Besides, the average person knows exponentially less about binary than they do about electricity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
When a computer only uses 1's and 0's it might be difficult to imagine how it would make a rude gesture but now I have a picture.
Look at the version where the line and circle are juxtaposed, so that the line points upward, breaking the circle ... it does look something like a rude gesture, now that it's pointed out.

Of course it's also another point against the 0 1 theory.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote