View Single Post
Old 03-20-2008, 10:01 AM   #147
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
Why should you? Copyright is a right and not property so why should the same intuitions hold?

Personally I think passing property to heirs should not be allowed but it is probably impossible to implement such a system. With copyright or other granted rights it is easy to implement a system were you cannot pass it along when you die.
The concept of "ownership" of a company is not "property" either; it is, in fact, very similar to the idea of copyright. In both cases, you are given the right to "control" something and make money from it. I don't think anyone would say that people shouldn't be able to pass on shares in a company in their will, so why single out copyright in this way? It is discrimination against people who create "ideas" rather than a physical object. Why should that discrimination exist? Creating a story is just as make a creative endeavor as creating a physical entity.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote