View Single Post
Old 06-20-2011, 04:29 AM   #4
Richey79
mrkrgnao
Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Richey79 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Richey79's Avatar
 
Posts: 241
Karma: 237248
Join Date: May 2010
Device: PRS650, K3 Wireless, Galaxy S3, iPad 3.
I'd suggest a better comparison would be between a photographer choosing film or digital.

There are still plenty out there who develop their own film, particularly black & white, and many of the reasons why they choose it over digital are similar to the reasons why one would choose eink over a back-lit screen: richer texture, better resolution, less distractions from the art-form, simplicity as a strength.

You might respond, 'aren't film-users more like p-book readers?' However, many who use film ultimately scan their negatives electronically, making selective use of tech developments in a similar way to those who choose eink readers.

No 'pro' photographer would ever make a digital film and then use individual still frames from the video.
Richey79 is offline   Reply With Quote