Quote:
|
You could save everyone some pain and suffering and yourself some legal bills by acknowledging the existence of the adjective that shall not be named.
|
First off, I'm not in the habit of punching anyone in the nose. Are you stereotyping again?
And of course I acknowledge the adjective's existence. I just see no valid reason for it to be used as the primary classification of
any work, since it's almost always relegated to secondary descriptor at best.
I'll stop now too.